<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Actor and the Housewife by Shannon Hale (and Shannon Singing . . .  Karaoke?!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/</link>
	<description>Maw Books - book reviews, book recommendations, book lists, author interviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:11:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amaterke</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-93795</link>
		<dc:creator>amaterke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-93795</guid>
		<description>Some more history about movies and actors:

Preceding film by thousands of years, plays and dances had elements common to film: scripts, sets, costumes, production, direction, actors, audiences, storyboards, and scores. Much terminology later used in film theory and criticism applied, such as mise en
 scene (roughly, the entire visual picture at any one time). Moving visual and aural images were not recorded for replaying as in film.
Anthemius of Tralles used an early type of camera obscura in the 6th century[1] The camera obscura was further described by Alhazen in his Book of Optics (1021),[2][3][4] and later near the year 1600, it was perfected by Giambattista della Porta. Light is inverted through a small hole or lens from outside, and projected onto a surface or screen, creating a moving image, but it is not preserved in a recording.
In the 1860s, mechanisms for producing two-dimensional drawings in motion were demonstrated with devices such as the zoetrope, mutoscope and praxinoscope. These machines were outgrowths of simple optical devices (such as magic lanterns) and would display sequences of still pictures at sufficient speed for the images on the pictures to appear to be moving, a phenomenon called persistence of vision. Naturally the images needed to be carefully designed to achieve the desired effect, and the underlying principle became the basis for the development of film animation.
With the development of celluloid film for still photography, it became possible to directly capture objects in motion in real time. An 1878 experiment by Eadweard Muybridge in the United States using 24 cameras produced a series of stereoscopic images of a galloping horse, arguably the first &quot;motion picture,&quot; though it was not called by this name. This technology required a person to look into a viewing machine to see the pictures which were separate paper prints attached to a drum turned by a handcrank. The pictures were shown at a variable speed of about 5 to 10 pictures per second, 
depending on how rapidly the crank was turned. Commercial versions of these machines were coin operated.

Historian man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more history about movies and actors:</p>
<p>Preceding film by thousands of years, plays and dances had elements common to film: scripts, sets, costumes, production, direction, actors, audiences, storyboards, and scores. Much terminology later used in film theory and criticism applied, such as mise en<br />
 scene (roughly, the entire visual picture at any one time). Moving visual and aural images were not recorded for replaying as in film.<br />
Anthemius of Tralles used an early type of camera obscura in the 6th century[1] The camera obscura was further described by Alhazen in his Book of Optics (1021),[2][3][4] and later near the year 1600, it was perfected by Giambattista della Porta. Light is inverted through a small hole or lens from outside, and projected onto a surface or screen, creating a moving image, but it is not preserved in a recording.<br />
In the 1860s, mechanisms for producing two-dimensional drawings in motion were demonstrated with devices such as the zoetrope, mutoscope and praxinoscope. These machines were outgrowths of simple optical devices (such as magic lanterns) and would display sequences of still pictures at sufficient speed for the images on the pictures to appear to be moving, a phenomenon called persistence of vision. Naturally the images needed to be carefully designed to achieve the desired effect, and the underlying principle became the basis for the development of film animation.<br />
With the development of celluloid film for still photography, it became possible to directly capture objects in motion in real time. An 1878 experiment by Eadweard Muybridge in the United States using 24 cameras produced a series of stereoscopic images of a galloping horse, arguably the first &#8220;motion picture,&#8221; though it was not called by this name. This technology required a person to look into a viewing machine to see the pictures which were separate paper prints attached to a drum turned by a handcrank. The pictures were shown at a variable speed of about 5 to 10 pictures per second,<br />
depending on how rapidly the crank was turned. Commercial versions of these machines were coin operated.</p>
<p>Historian man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura H</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-49806</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-49806</guid>
		<description>Finished this last night. I can honestly say that I didnt enjoy it. Their close relationship stressed me out. I guess I&#039;m too prude but I would not be excited or supportive if my husband had a close girl buddy, who he talked to all the time and spent alone time with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished this last night. I can honestly say that I didnt enjoy it. Their close relationship stressed me out. I guess I&#8217;m too prude but I would not be excited or supportive if my husband had a close girl buddy, who he talked to all the time and spent alone time with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Mc</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-46369</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-46369</guid>
		<description>I just finished this book last night (picked it up at the library based on your blog review) and I thought it was the most ridiculous book I&#039;ve ever read.  I found myself reading passages aloud to my husband, who just cringed (going to church potlucks are painful, reading about them, even more so).  I&#039;m a LDS SAHM, so this should be right up my alley, but, holy cow, this was hard to finish.  They only reason I did was I knew it was suppose to get &quot;sad&quot; and I wanted to see it through to the end.

Like you said, it&#039;s not for everyone, and certainly not for me, regardless of the genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished this book last night (picked it up at the library based on your blog review) and I thought it was the most ridiculous book I&#8217;ve ever read.  I found myself reading passages aloud to my husband, who just cringed (going to church potlucks are painful, reading about them, even more so).  I&#8217;m a LDS SAHM, so this should be right up my alley, but, holy cow, this was hard to finish.  They only reason I did was I knew it was suppose to get &#8220;sad&#8221; and I wanted to see it through to the end.</p>
<p>Like you said, it&#8217;s not for everyone, and certainly not for me, regardless of the genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn M</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44199</guid>
		<description>I have &lt;i&gt;Austenland&lt;/i&gt; with a book mark in the first chapter on my nightstand.  I started it and then stopped for some reason...not because I didn&#039;t like it.  I must have just gotten interrupted and forgot about it for a bit.

I&#039;ve enjoyed other Shannon Hale books.  This one sounds very interesting.

You mean mormon housewives don&#039;t bake pies all day long???  Sheesh I thought that was all you did in Utah. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have <i>Austenland</i> with a book mark in the first chapter on my nightstand.  I started it and then stopped for some reason&#8230;not because I didn&#8217;t like it.  I must have just gotten interrupted and forgot about it for a bit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed other Shannon Hale books.  This one sounds very interesting.</p>
<p>You mean mormon housewives don&#8217;t bake pies all day long???  Sheesh I thought that was all you did in Utah. <img src='http://blog.mawbooks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44185</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44185</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve yet to read a book by her.  I&#039;m not quite sure what&#039;s holding me back--Austenland sounded pleasant and I&#039;ve heard great things about her YA books.  I like the idea that this one transcends genre, perhaps I&#039;ll have to start with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve yet to read a book by her.  I&#8217;m not quite sure what&#8217;s holding me back&#8211;Austenland sounded pleasant and I&#8217;ve heard great things about her YA books.  I like the idea that this one transcends genre, perhaps I&#8217;ll have to start with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44169</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44169</guid>
		<description>I was also at the signing, that is how I found your blog. I love going to other blogs and seeing pictures from events that I was also at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also at the signing, that is how I found your blog. I love going to other blogs and seeing pictures from events that I was also at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44152</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44152</guid>
		<description>I would pick Matthew McConaughey!  Totally!
And after 20+ years with the same man - he would probably be ok with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pick Matthew McConaughey!  Totally!<br />
And after 20+ years with the same man &#8211; he would probably be ok with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44076</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44076</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this lovely review, Natasha! I&#039;ve this book on my TBR list and I can&#039;t wait to dive into it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this lovely review, Natasha! I&#8217;ve this book on my TBR list and I can&#8217;t wait to dive into it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa (Book Nut)</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-44021</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa (Book Nut)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-44021</guid>
		<description>Colin Firth. Or Brendan Fraser. (It&#039;s totally cool that Shannon and you are on a first name basis... :) And yes, my hubby would be cool about it. 

I loved the book, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin Firth. Or Brendan Fraser. (It&#8217;s totally cool that Shannon and you are on a first name basis&#8230; <img src='http://blog.mawbooks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And yes, my hubby would be cool about it. </p>
<p>I loved the book, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margot</title>
		<link>http://blog.mawbooks.com/2009/06/29/the-actor-and-the-housewife-by-shannon-hale/#comment-43982</link>
		<dc:creator>Margot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mawbooks.com/?p=3150#comment-43982</guid>
		<description>I like your review of this book. Adding the author&#039;s opinion and the quotes gave your review more depth. Now I&#039;m interested in reading the book.  As to favorite actors - it&#039;s George Clooney. I&#039;m sure I could think of something to talk about with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your review of this book. Adding the author&#8217;s opinion and the quotes gave your review more depth. Now I&#8217;m interested in reading the book.  As to favorite actors &#8211; it&#8217;s George Clooney. I&#8217;m sure I could think of something to talk about with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

